David Icke, Arizona Wilder and the Biggest Secret
The following is a short summary of a minor investigation into aspects
of David Icke’s latest book and his star witnesses Arizona Wilder and
Credo Mutwa. Wilder claims to have been a mind controlled slave who
performed Satanic rituals for the Illuminati at which she witnessed
many famous people including the Queen Mother, shapeshift physically
from a human to a lizard and consume sacrificial victims. She claims
that since her programming broke down she has been able to reveal this
information to the wider public.
My own role in the Biggest Secret saga was that I was asked by David to
help him check spelling and offer any further information to his
initial draft of the book. It was following my input that David was
introduced to Arizona and heard her revelations, which subsequently
became a focal point within the book and used as ‘evidence’ to support
various themes outlined therein.
Having discussed my concerns with David’s wife and having sent David
e-mails outlining my concerns over errors in his book and a feeling I
have that he has been set up with misinformation and been the target of
psychic manipulation, over a period from before publication to very
recently (September 1999), and as yet having absolutely no feedback
from David about any of the major concerns, I decided to publish my
findings at the David Icke website forum.
Consequently, I was banned from attending that forum by David Icke.
I wish it to be known that I bear David Icke no malice over this affair
and the reason for publishing this information is to seek clarification
and also offer information of which most may not be aware. My fears may
be unfounded, but I feel that after reading this, you may see they are
justified. And if my fears have solid foundation, these issues need
urgent clarification, both for the sake of David Icke and his readers.
My suspicions about Arizona Wilder (AW) first manifested the first time
I heard of her. Something in me said, ‘something isn’t right here’. A
familiar feeling which usually turns out to be trustworthy, as anyone
who has read Lifting The Veil knows.
She was not mentioned at all in the draft copy of The Biggest Secret
(TBS) which I had read. David had not met her yet. When the book was
released people started ringing me with questions like, ‘is it true
about the reptiles’, and ‘is this stuff about the royal family true’.
At which time I replied that I thought it was, based on the fact that
the version I had read stated only the theory of the reptilians and
that certain of the Royals were involved in Satanic rituals.
Soon I heard about Arizona Wilder. I reviewed the book again, this time
the printed version, and asked Linda Icke (the British manager of
Bridge of Love) to send a copy of the video from which AW’s testimony
was taken. I was by this time very dubious about AW’s statements. Her
statements had already overshadowed those of Christine Fitzgerald,
Princess Diana’s healer and confidante, which were prominent in the
version I read and which were not so sensational. However, Fitzgerald’s
account may have been a ‘taster’ for what was to come, to ease the way
for the far more incredible information which Wilder had to impart.
David stated that he saw his encounter with AW as an amazing
synchronicity which endorsed his work in his latest book. How could she
have known all of this stuff which tallied so exactly with TBS? Well, I
believe I am not as naïve as David, and I know exactly how she could
have known. He was passing copies of the book via post to me and others
for editing. It was on computer. Both are simple to access by
Intelligence people. We had also spoken over the phone about the
reptilian issue. In fact I am shocked that David does not see this as a
possibility himself.
This brings I another character who is pivotal to the entire Biggest
Secret thesis. It was a contact of David’s named Brian Desborough who
introduced Arizona to David. Brian is mentioned as a source for a great
deal of information in the book, having supplied most of the material
upon which David based his idea that Martians came to Earth and founded
the Aryan race which the reptilians used as a vehicle to overtake the
planet. Brian is also the source of much of the information David had
compiled on the Babylonian world, its myths and how they fed into the
sinister secret societies.
It was Brian Desborough, a scientist and researcher who had worked
for several aerospace companies, who was also looking at the draft copy
of the Biggest Secret at the same time as myself; i.e. before David met
Arizona Wilder. Therefore the fact that Brian Desborough may be
responsible for fundamentally leading the direction of David’s
research, if not planting much of the basis of the book in David’s
mind, is obvious. But then to be the same person responsible for giving
him a so-called eye-witness to testify to the verity of that
information is highly suspicious. Brian also writes articles on mind
control and seems very knowledgeable on the subject. Is it possible
that he could be directly involved in some way that we are not being
told about? Cathy O’Brien testifies to having been taken to military
aerospace locations and NASA bases for trauma-based programming.
David met AW and interviewed her for about 2 hours. Some of the
questions were quite leading, but her testimony revealed an awful lot
if you know what you are looking for. She did indeed endorse a great
deal of David’s own theses; that is other people’s theses (again
including many of Desborough’s) which David has agreed with. So
closely, in fact, you would almost think she had already read the book
- or had been given the information beforehand! Or, considering that
she claims to be an ex-mind controlled slave, could it be she was
pre-programmed? Testimony from Mark Philips and Cathy O’Brien as to how
arduous it is to deprogram a CIA slave makes me very suspicious that AW
could be considered reliable. She claims that since her programmer
died, the programming broke down. I don’t believe this can be accepted
as such, and external experts would have to be brought in to convince
me that if she was controlled to the highest level, that she could be
so deprogrammed now as to be considered reliable.
And don’t forget how much influence her testimony had to the final
version of David’s book. It was her and only her who provided all the
information about physically shapeshifting royalty, Pindar, the Belgian
blood rituals which were allegedly attended by everyone from Laurence
Gardner (!!??) to the Queen Mother!
Before I watched the video I dowsed the box with a pendulum and asked
questions. I don’t usually use dowsing, but considered it may be useful
to evaluate this case from as many angles as I could because if I was
correct in my gut feeling then I had stumbled upon some very
significant realisations. The basic questions were:
Was she going to be telling me the truth? Yes. Wow! I hadn’t expected that.
Was she also going to be telling lies? Yes. Ah!
As I thought she was a Multiple Personality, I assumed that she had
been set up. So I asked, ‘Is she going to deliberately misinform
David?’ Yes. This made me curious because I thought she would be doing
it from programming.
I always like to ask questions I know the answers of now and then to check whether I am interpreting the pendulum correctly.
So I asked a question I was sure of the answer to: ‘Is she a programmed
multiple?’ No. That was absolutely the last thing I expected. I
couldn’t see how she could be lying to deliberately misinform and not
been a set-up multiple stooge.
‘Then she isn’t a multiple?’ Yes.
‘So has she ever been programmed as a multiple?’ No.
‘She is going to lie deliberately in full awareness?’ Yes.
Now that was only an initial test and I don’t put too much store in my
abilities as a dowser. But I tell you my line of enquiry so that you
know.
So I watched the video in order to get the full picture.
As I said, her testimony tallied so well with David’s that I can see
how he was so impressed. He has always stated that he works on
cross-referencing testimonies and ‘synchronicities’ as proof. Well,
this time I think the Intelligence people took advantage of that one!
More revealing, however, about AW’s ‘evidence’ was that she demonised
the ancient archetypes and occult images throughout. Osiris, Isis,
Druids, even Harvest Festival. My own research tells me that there is a
very positive side to these things. In fact these things are exactly
what the Bible was written to obscure. AW’s testimony was overtly
Judeo-Christian in its level of gross and blanket demonisation of the
occult. Something which I had warned David about doing when I read his
draft. Something which he promised to amend for the final version.
But of course, that was before he met AW. And as a consequence of her
testimony, it seems, David decided not to balance out his demonisation,
but instead increased it. If I was going to set David up to make that
mistake, that’s exactly how I would have done it!
Then came some obvious bloopers. Having claimed to have been a
multiple, she also states she forgets certain names of people.
Multiples have photographic memory and perfect recall (see Cathy
O’Brien’s testimonies). This memory lapse does not happen in recovered
multiples.
Her facts were either regularly wrong, or so full of spin that she was
hardly credible. Other information is impossible for anyone to verify,
conveniently.
I checked with 2 occultists about her description of the demon raising
ritual and both stated she had it wrong. Strange for a top level
Satanist!
Then she targeted Sitchin and Gardner and said they take part in blood
rituals with the Royals where shapeshifting happens. Considering
Gardner’s books are revealing profound insights into the ancient
knowledge, I am not surprised they wanted him demonised. I personally
do not believe this testimony. I do however, think that Sitchin has
been less than honest in his research, but again, the statement that he
takes part in murderous rituals is more than I will accept without some
pretty firm proof. But proof is offered nowhere in relation to AW’s
testimony.
She states the royal lizards change back to lizards when asleep.
Considering how many of them were educated in schools where they also
lived amongst hundreds of others in dorms, and how many of them were in
the armed forces, you would think someone would have noticed this
little thing!
She states that the royal lizards can’t stay in human form at the scent
of blood and transform and go crazy, ripping into their victims. And in
all those years nobody has ever noticed this when they have cut
themselves, been around blood, menstruating women etc. Considering they
are so public, there is no way they have never been in the vicinity of
blood. No signs there though either.
I thought, ‘this is just too ridiculous for words. David how the hell are you allowing this nonsense to influence you?’
She regularly inverts important ideas. The ancient Egyptians were
anointed with the fat of the dragon - the sacred crocodile. AW states
that the royal lizards anoint themselves with the fat of humans. Head
lizard is Pindar. How similar is Pindar to ben Pandir, the Talmudic
name for Jesus? Reversal at a deep archetypal and psychological level?
I think so. And there are more examples too numerous to go into. I
think you get the point.
Then strange things started happening as I watched the video. I kept
getting psychic impressions of other people overlaid on her face. The
first, Ingrid Pitt, whom I associate with Countess Bathory as she
played her in the film Countess Dracula. Bathory is reputed to have
been kept young by bathing in the blood of virgins.
Then, of all people, Jimmy Carter. I immediately recall David’s
testimony in ‘And The Truth Shall Set You Free’, where he describes
being possessed by Carter’s energy from which he needed healing later.
Was that a hint that David had been possessed again?
Then Sigourney Weaver. I had been informed by a seer once that she is a
predator vehicle, like many others in the Hollywood scene. That is, she
is possessed by the reptoid/Luciferic consciousness. I cannot claim to
know that to be true, but it did seem to fit very neatly with the
scenario I was experiencing.
Then a face I couldn’t put a name to at first. I didn’t know where I
had seen her. Then later I realised, it was the face of the head alien
reptile in the television series V, called Diana. A reptile in human
skin who was conning the world to believe that the reptile aliens were
on their side.
Was my higher self telling me something here or what?! Was AW a
predator vehicle too, and not a multiple at all, like the dowsing
suggested?
Again, I wanted more proof.
As I had been a nurse for 9 years, I am quite aware of body language
and communication. What I was seeing with AW was someone who was far
too inexpressive with her hands and expressions. She seemed to be
deliberately avoiding any kind of body language in case she gave the
game away.
I also know a genuine multiple who HAS performed satanic ritual called
Patti and whom I had introduced David to years ago, setting him off on
the track of this whole Satanic thing. He refers to her in his books ‘I
Am Me, I Am Free’ and ‘The Biggest Secret’ as ‘a contact from
Darlington’. I know this woman well and am accustomed to her body
language and how she flips between personalities and how she displays
quite notable body language if you know what you are looking for. I
also have interviewed her priest (an exorcist) and her ex-Harley Street
therapist and discussed this subject at length. And I have spoken to
Cathy O’Brien and Mark Philips about this, albeit briefly.
To me, AW was not displaying what I expected in terms of body language. Everything I saw told me she was hiding something.
So I contacted the aforementioned expert; a professional therapist,
specialising in multiples and victims of abuse, including those from
government level paedophile circles. I had introduced her to David a
couple of years ago and he mentions her in TBS. She looked at the video
and agreed with my analysis. AW was not a multiple, nor seems to have
ever been one. Her body language did not reveal this and suggested that
she was deliberately lying and trying to keep from revealing this. She
also has grave concerns about David, his health, his reptilian thesis,
and that he may be under a great deal of pressure and psychic attack
from those trying to pervert his work. She agreed that what I suspected
was the more likely case - AW is a deliberate set up and her testimony
is absolutely not to be trusted.
I also emailed Cathy O’Brien and Mark Philips for a comment from them,
but got no response. I later heard from another contact that they were
avoiding speaking out about David’s latest book.
I later got calls from some very concerned people telling me that AW
tripped their inner warning bells so much that they couldn’t accept her
testimony and for that reason were very dubious about the book.
Others contacted me to say they were seeing negative energies around David.
If AW is a Satanist and has the kind of power she claims - and she
would have to be one of the world’s most powerful magicians to work for
the global elite in their highest rituals - then David is in extreme
danger of being infected by her demonic magic if he spends any time
with her. If I am wrong, and she is a multiple, but has not recovered,
she may be working on David without either his or her knowledge.
She also claims to be part of a church involved in satanic ritual. But
she also claims to be out of it. But she also knows enough to warn
people about forthcoming rituals. Is she in, or is she out? Who can
tell?
How is she still around considering what she is revealing?
How did they let her programming slip?
How come she was performing rituals with the likes of Tony Blair (that
means it must be very recent) at a time when her programming was coming
apart? I have seen the chaos Patti goes through as she has been
regaining coherence over the years. And this is the woman we are
expected was performing the highest level rituals in the world? Give me
a break!
So I phoned Linda Icke. I told her of my concerns. As well as my
concerns over David’s historical inaccuracies, lack of occult
understanding, and flaws in his reptilian thesis. I said I was
concerned that he had stated on radio that he was unusually drained of
energy and had been ill for a while. She agreed I may be right and said
that David has to face his own mistakes and defend himself in his own
way.
Amazingly, when I told her what had transpired over the video and what
I had looked into, she told me that David doesn’t actually trust AW!!!!
‘He’s the first to say "you can’t trust her,"’ she said!!!
So why is he selling a 2-hour interview with the woman?!
Why is he accepting her testimony at all?
Why has he refashioned so much of his work around her claims?
If it hadn’t been for her, the text would be far less sensational, less
risible and have a far more balanced analysis of the occult.
This single woman has so overshadowed the real information in TBS that
I no longer am able to trust a lot of it simply on David’s say so. I no
longer trust David’s previously excellent antenna for getting to the
truth.
Has Wilder also done something to David to lower his guard and turn him
around? He certainly does not seem to me to be the same man he was. And
that is what I am hearing time and time again from other people too.
I then contacted two people whom I know and trust who I consider to be
as knowledgeable about the psychic aspects as I believe anybody could
be. They both said the video was total nonsense. One (a well known
author and Remote Viewing and mind control expert) agreed with my
analysis 100%, that she was part of an Intelligence set up.
I showed Patti. She called the video, ‘A piece of shit.’ But granted, she may not be considered the ideal judge.
I had reports of people hosting David’s lectures who were so disturbed
by the incredibility of the video that they stated that if it were not
for the fact that it was David supporting it, they would never have
sold it.
Then consider the Illuminati ritual post on the website, which I refer
to in my chapter The Predators (Truth Campaign magazine 14). AW and
David warn people about key dates and asked them to send love and light
to the reptiles. As I pointed out in the article, this only feeds the
problem as they are feeding an illusion - a psychotronic virus.
Moreover, on one of the dates mentioned, I attended, but did not
partake in, a mass channelling meditation, which was actually a guided
meditation which opened the participating crowd up to predator
possession.
I feel compelled to see this as further confirmation that the entire AW
scenario is part of a wider conspiracy to jointly misinform,
psychically attack and control the audience!
Who is influencing David Icke and why? The results of following the book, and his advice certainly seem sinister.
Then we had the solar eclipse, another blood ritual date according to
AW. David went to the Great Pyramid in Egypt on that date for the
eclipse and made all kinds of superficial comments about what seemed to
be going on there. He said people were prevented from going in, that
the attendees may be using underground tunnels to get in to do their
blood rituals etc. No proof. And everything was adequately explained by
Amargi Hiller, an independent journalist who works closely
investigating the Giza site, in a message which was posted on David’s
Forum.
But what did David do?
On this very powerful day, he had people all over the world sending
thought energy based upon the most horrific images of blood-spattered
tombs and child sacrifice, DIRECTED AT PERHAPS THE MOST POWERFUL ENERGY
POINT IN THE WORLD! Did they really need to do a blood ritual with that
kind of energy focussed on it? Is this another way that David has been
set up to actually do the very job he is trying to expose?
I refer you to my chapter on the predators to see how that may fit into the Illuminati agenda.
Soon after this, David re-emerged from a trip to Africa announcing a
new video called The Reptilian Agenda, which is an interview with a
Zulu shaman called Credo Mutwa, who is confirming the existence of
shapeshifting reptilians.
Credo recounts various ancient Zulu myths about the reptilian race
which manipulates mankind, which are taken literally by himself and
Icke and seen as remarkable confirmation of the reptile/human-race
theory; although Credo’s version is that the race actually originated
on Earth, left it and returned. Furthermore, the central reptile/Aryan
race thesis is fundamentally challenged by Mutwa’s assertion that the
black leaders of his country, and their bloodlines are from the
reptilian race also.
Mutwa also speaks about personal encounters with ‘grey’ aliens, which
he states are servants of the reptilians. He recounts eating the ‘grey,
rather dry’ skin of the greys - which caused an hallucinogenic
experience very reminiscent of LSD or similar drug experiences as well
as a rash and intense itching. This, again, parallels MKULTRA mind
control experiments/implantation experiences described by military
abductees. Mutwa elsewhere, rather contradictorily, states elsewhere
that ‘greys’ are actually reptilians with an artificial ‘skin’. This
contradiction is not challenged by Icke.
Interestingly, this man claims to have been abducted 40 years ago by
greys, had something stuffed up his nose into his head etc. In an
interview with The Spectrum Newspaper, Mutwa recalls walking down the
street one day when a man approached him and quizzed him about knowing
him from somewhere, and he recalled a memory about being in the
underground facility where he was taken following his abduction, where
he was experimented on by ‘greys’ in ways remarkably consistent with
the classic MILAB (Military Abduction) scenario.
Mutwa states in the interview that this exact same thing has happened to many of his people.
The link with Montauk is also interesting. One engineer working on the
‘Montauk Project’, Preston Nichols, talks of having worked in the
project - which included abductions for mind control. He says he
remembers working in underground bases where greys and a reptilian
creature also were. He recovered the memory of this after being
confronted in the street by a man quizzing him on having seen him
somewhere before.
This parallel, almost identical, scenario seems to be too coincidental.
I think the greys and reptoid were implants in the vein described by
Helmut Lammer in his book MILABS. Both tales have all the hallmarks of
mind control. Mutwa is therefore, for my money, not a credible witness
for David Icke.
David sees Mutwa as ‘proof’ of his thesis in his latest book, and since
slightly altered aspects of his views to accommodate Mutwa’s new
information. Again, there is severe doubt cast on yet another of
David’s main sources of information on the reptilian issue.
However, the alien abduction issue aside, Mutwa seems a very genuine
and sincere man, bravely determined to tell the world about what he
feels is the plight of his people and their dreadful manipulation by
the Illuminati forces. His interview with Spectrum can be read on
Icke’s website.
Both Mutwa and Wilder may be consciously absolutely genuine in
recounting their experiences according to their memories. But knowing
what we do about the long history of Illuminati/intelligence/military
abduction and false memory implantation, mind-control etc., for
propaganda, subversion and discrediting of witnesses purposes, I
believe we need to be extremely careful before buying into what amount
to little more than two circumstantial stories that offer next to no
proof, given what we know of their backgrounds. One is a self-admitted
Illuminati agent, and the other a self-admitted ‘alien abductee’.
I ask you to consider this. Ask you self who benefits from you buying
into Wilder’s and Credo Mutwa’s stories? Then consider what David says
himself: ‘JUST A COINCIDENCE, NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT!’
It’s entirely up to you. I am just giving this from my viewpoint.
I may be wrong. If I am, I apologise unreservedly for casting
aspersions on those who may be genuine. But I think there are enough
doubts to warrant further explanation from someone at Bridge of Love.
Because if Wilder’s and Desborough’s claims in The Biggest Secret are
essentially true, then it needs to be acted upon as a matter of
urgency. But the evidence needs to be as accurate and enforceable as
possible. At present I don’t believe that a large amount of the
so-called ‘evidence’ is any more than highly speculative, inaccurate
and suspicious.
Does anybody have any more information to add to this?
Do David or Brian Desborough have any information to give us to show us
we can trust Wilder? Is there anything David could tell us about Brian
Desborough’s background to allay any doubts we may have about his
integrity, considering his massive influence in the content and
direction of The Biggest Secret?
Does anybody have any direct proof of any of the wild claims being
made? For example, if Mutwa has captured greys and eaten them, then are
there any remains, photographs or corroborating witnesses to present?
For, until some actual evidence of this story appears, all we have is a
very good draft of a science fiction novel that still needs careful
work to iron out the inconsistencies in the plot.
I wonder how many of the loopholes in the story will be closed as the
thesis is conveniently ironed out over time, so that it serves as the
‘master-theory’ of conspiracy theories? How many remarkable witnesses
will appear who have more pieces of the jigsaw as David strives to
prove that his theory is really the Biggest Secret?
One historical inconsistency of David’s book has been closed by Mutwa,
as he tells of how the reptilians ordered that no direct image of their
real appearance was to be depicted by anyone, otherwise that would mean
instant death. This conveniently closes a loophole which David missed
in his book, that despite claims by him to the contrary, there are
actually very few depictions of reptilian gods in ancient sources. Of
course we now know why. Instead, we are told, people depicted them in
code, using various ciphers such as fish scaled creatures instead of
reptilian scales etc.
But oddly, in an interview with Jeff Rense on his Sightings radio show
on 14 October 1999, Mutwa claimed that the figure of Darth Maul - the
alien ‘baddie’ in the latest Star Wars movie – is an absolute dead
ringer for one of these ‘gods’, right down to the colour. As yet, I
have not heard of the mass demise of George Lucas or the Star Wars
makeup department and design team. Like the above example of the grey
flesh vs. artificial skin contradiction, such inconsistencies go
unchallenged by Icke and, it seems, by most of his audience. David has
an excellent track record of bringing hard to get information into the
wider public arena. He has worked extremely hard and endured a great
deal of ridicule for courageously speaking out and standing up for what
he believes in. It would be ‘The Biggest Shame’, if his efforts and
work were to be overtaken and used by the very forces he seeks to
expose.